africa China

If Not China, Who? Competing in Africa Through Foreign Military Education

Countering China Matter Week

By Matthew Quintero

“If not China, who?” was a question asked throughout a class on overseas investment in Africa. The speaker was an African naval officer. The category was equally composed of American and African army officers, and the place was america Naval Warfare School (NWC). The African officers all appeared to nod in settlement while the remainder of the room shrugged. The writer has heard this remark several occasions earlier than by different exasperated African officers. They have been uninterested in being reminded that China was solely in the natural assets of their homelands, or that China was building ports, bases, and infrastructure on loans their nations might hardly repay. They have been also acutely conscious that China’s “no strings attached” improvement focused their weak governments and “big man” regimes. It was typically troublesome for this specific officer to precise himself, as English was his third language after Bantu and French. But on this present day he made himself very clear, stating:

“All Africans want democracy. We all want to be like the United States. We need help with roads and infrastructure, but our governments cannot work with USAID and the World Bank. Who can the people get help from? If not China, who?”

In his mind, China was serving to precisely where it mattered. The query of whether or not the U.S. or China invests extra in Africa was irrelevant. This was a matter of sentiments and perceptions. If competitors for the Indian Ocean throughout peacetime requires constructing partnerships with African nations, the U.S. will probably be greatest served by specializing in individuals fairly than ports or platforms. But because it now developments,  a whole aspect of the Indian Ocean in the type of east African nations is poised to embrace deeper strategic partnership with China.

Chinese language Options to African Problems?

Like each different continent, Africa has issues. Africa has the youngest and quickest rising population in the world. By 2035, almost half of all Africans will inhabit urban areas with poor infrastructure. These cities will wrestle to offer their citizens with food, water, shelter, and employment. Africa’s GDP exponentially elevated over the past decade because of the worldwide scramble for its wealthy national assets. But with this exceptional rise in GDP, there has not been a corresponding rise in youth employment. Typically when overseas buyers come to Africa with a necessity for technical expertise they don’t find yourself hiring African companies. This feeds a cycle of “brain drain” where Africans with scientific and technical levels depart the continent for higher employment elsewhere.

Local weather change will even check city infrastructure. Africa is warming at 1.5 occasions the global common. Flooding and rising sea degree will regularly influence the quarter of the continental inhabitants that lives inside 60 miles of a coast. Local weather change is estimated to value Africa $50 billion per yr by 2040. These struggling cities may also should cope with the burden of displaced peoples.

Civil wars and ethnic struggles proceed to foster Boko Haram in the West, Al Shabab in the East, and Al-Qaeda in the Maghreb. Of their wake, “populations of concern” whether or not they be refugees, asylum seekers, or internally displaced persons, have tremendously multiplied in the previous decade. Porous land and maritime borders, along with authorities corruption, facilitate felony exercise. These extremist teams can then draw on public anger at government corruption to recruit and radicalize disenfranchised youth. This resentment is simply made worse when police and army forces abuse local populations in their hunt for extremists.

Lots of Africa’s woes are signs of government lack of ability to react to the changing African setting. Managing the impression of overseas actors, inhabitants, climate change, violence, and economic progress will all depend upon governance. In response to the Ibrahim Index of African Governance, general governance throughout the continent is on a touch upward development. The past decade has also seen a wave of democratic reform, in which six nations have voted to limit presidential phrases along with enhancing decentralized governance. But, greater than 1 / 4 of Africa’s inhabitants has never seen a change in management. Coincident with this upward development, African governments show growing divergence in efficiency. Some governments are getting higher, whereas others are getting worse.

The belief of the significance of “good governance” in Africa has created a dilemma for donor nations. Conventional sources of improvement such as the World Bank and the USA Company for Worldwide Improvement (USAID) have safeguards constructed into their assist that are supposed to cease or sluggish funding ought to the ruling governments use the help for patrimonial functions or in the violation of human rights. For a lot of African nations, World Bank help solely comes with guarantees of democratic reform. Corrupt and oppressive regimes ultimately refuse help or refuse to vary in order to qualify for assist. These similar regimes typically rule the place infrastructure and other improvement tasks are wanted most. Ought to good governance or improvement come first? This hen and egg dilemma is the subject of much present debate regarding international help. And into this setting, China steps in.

As China’s want for commodities grows so does its involvement in Africa. China has invested heavily in Africa via the One belt, One Street initiative, and the Forum on Chinese language-African Cooperation. With a coverage of “noninterference,” Chinese language improvement supposedly comes with “no strings attached,” which means that China is ready and prepared to work with corrupt African governments.

China could be very effectively offering a counter-narrative to “western” worldwide institutions. These concepts have most just lately manifested in BRICS, the union of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. BRICS members see themselves as leaders of the creating world and have their very own agenda and improvement funds, liberated from restrictions positioned on assist by the United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), and United States. This has worked very nicely for China. African nations are lining as much as obtain help, and for his or her efforts, many Africans view China favorably.

But it will be unfair to say that Africans do not understand who they are coping with. African civil society has criticized China for failing to promote good governance and human rights. For the African officers in certain conflict school courses, while they don’t necessarily like China, they don’t see improvement via the lens of nice power competition. They see infrastructure tasks growing the quality of life inside their nations. These tasks simply occur to be Chinese and not of another overseas actor.

If not China, who will assist? China wins over public opinion once they develop in nations with corrupt or weak governments. But Africa should have governments and societies in a position to withstand each Chinese language and U.S. influence, should that affect be malign. Capable democratic governments can be better outfitted to deal with their own problems and maintain overseas actors in verify.  That’s what the U.S. must attempt for. To counter China in Africa, the U.S. must promote resilient, affluent African states and not spheres of influence.

A Position for Foreign Military Education

In the parlance of Multi-Domain Operations, how does the U.S. compete with China for entry to the East African coast? If the problem is governance, what position can the U.S. army probably play? While debating these questions and government policies, international officers must ponder of the heated debates that happen in American warfare school lecture rooms. People typically converse critically of the U.S. government, however might African officers converse critically of their own governments? Might these conversations ever happen in a Chinese language warfare school?

The U.S. army can greatest compete with China for affect in Africa via overseas army schooling. Influence will come when African leaders see that good governance, respect for human rights, and abiding by international regulation is value working towards. U.S. army leaders can work instantly with African army leadership, specifically in struggle school settings the place uniformed service meets free speech and important considering. More African officers coaching side-by-side with vibrant U.S. army officers and civilian professors is where the U.S. can reconcile floor fact with strategic aspirations.

Foreign army schooling targeted on governance, accountability, and human rights is a small sliver of Protection Establishment Building (DIB). DIB nests within Security Sector Reform (SSR), which falls beneath Safety Sector Assistance (SSA). DIB, SSR, and SSA spheres overlap and funding for subordinate packages is held by both the Division of Defense (DoD) and the Department of State (DoS). Education of this type at present falls underneath DoS’s International Military Education and Training (IMET) program. Amongst other aims, IMET espouses a “respect for…democracy and…internationally recognized human rights.” IMET receives the least funding of all DoS international SSA efforts, and sub-Saharan Africa only receives 14 % of funds allocated to Africa. IMET can also be prone to solely going to nations the DoS and DoD can agree on, slightly than where it might do probably the most good. While the DoD is charged with administering IMET, DoS determines the recipients, and Congress controls the funding. DoD have to be in “lockstep” with the DoS throughout the annual finances request process to make sure each departments wants are met.

DoD “Regional Centers for Security” (RC) can fulfill features just like IMET. The DoD price range for SSA considerably trumps that of DoS, but most of these funds are targeted on the tactical coaching and equipping of associate militaries in their efforts to defeat transnational threats. RCs are the exception as they’re DoD funded schooling instruments serving regional combatant commanders. RC roles have expanded from “strengthening civil-military relations in democratic society” to “the promotion of democratic accountability” and “respect for human rights.” In a given yr the DoD can practice over twice as many overseas army personnel by means of RCs than DoS can by way of IMET. These packages are totally different, yet overlap toward the same aims, and therein lies alternative.

Gen. David Rodriguez (entrance row second from left), commander U.S. Africa Command, visited the U.S. Naval Conflict School in Newport, R.I., to satisfy with African nation Navy students who’re at present attending the school in resident packages for international officers. (U.S. Navy photograph by Mr. John Stone)

If extra funding for schooling is untenable, the Gordian knot of SSA might be solved by more effectively coordinating the schooling efforts of DoD and DoS. The DoD Inspector Basic summarized the state of affairs nicely in reporting that “Without DIB policy that distinguished the DIB roles of…the Regional Centers or any other office or command conducting DIB-related efforts, a potential for duplication and inefficiency existed.” With the top aim of teaching a whole army on international norms and good governance, RCs don’t essentially target the required audience. IMET is meant for a large viewers of relatively younger overseas officials. Conversely, RCs cater to a more selective group of senior overseas officers. Nevertheless, as DoD initiatives, RCs are less weak than IMET to political leveraging. IMET may be turned off resulting from political instability or coup makes an attempt inside the associate nation, which brings it back to the great governance versus improvement dilemma.

Foreign army schooling is of far larger importance and strategic potential than is presently realized, however these are sometimes among the first forms of packages to be reduce from budgets. If for no other cause, the U.S. should tackle worldwide army schooling because China is competing in this area as properly.

China’s School of Defense Studies

The writer wouldn’t have been aware of China’s competition in this area if it weren’t for African counterparts. Their story went one thing like this, “China has an international program too, but in China they teach us in our languages, we get a diploma, and a considerable stipend.” Every worldwide scholar the writer ever interacted with was extremely grateful for his or her alternative to review at a U.S. struggle school, however this notice about language is very important. Most African college students at the Naval Struggle School did not arrive with the requisite mastery of English to complete a grasp’s diploma.

Once they arrive in the U.S., the primary stop for many international college students is Lackland AFB in San Antonio, Texas. Right here they attend the English language course at the Defense Language Institute. They are put by way of a rigorous program, however at the very least for certain African colleagues, most did not meet the requirements of the language and writing screener once they checked into the Naval Struggle School. Failing this check ensured that these students would only obtain a certificates of completion and never the diploma that the majority other students acquired. Even a 25-week course in English might fail to organize a Swahili speaker for an English-only graduate faculty accredited by the identical source as close by Harvard and Yale. Nevertheless, if given enough time to communicate, most of those college students had as much if no more to contribute to any conversation about international politics than U.S. college students. As most courses have been held in a fast-paced seminar setting, one might only marvel in the event that they felt their statements might impression discussions.

Since 2012, China’s School of Protection Studies (CDS) has awarded warfare school grasp’s levels to international college students. CDS is a program inside the Peoples Liberation Military Nationwide Defense University (PLA NDU) that gives a strategic and operational degree defense schooling to international college students. It caters to most officer ranks and identical to the U.S. warfare schools it is a year-long program that ends with a grasp’s degree. CDS particularly targets sub-Saharan Africa for potential enrollments, and courses are available in Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish. And, identical to the international packages at the U.S. struggle schools, there are cultural tours and spouses clubs. However not the whole lot is identical.

In contrast to the U.S. conflict schools, the international students will not be nicely built-in with the larger PLA NDU scholar physique. Alumni of CDS have been essential of the bodily location of their faculty, which is in a totally totally different part of Beijing from the PLA NDU. This distance made interplay with Chinese counterparts very troublesome. Alumni additionally report that a lot of the course incorporates China’s official view of the U.S. as a “neo-imperialist,” especially in Africa, and there’s little or no deviation from this official place in their discussion. The relative power of U.S. international packages is discovered in these differences since international college students in the U.S. are invited to explore the great and dangerous of American society. In comparison with the U.S. system, China’s methods of physical separation and imposed ideology do not supply worth in terms of attracting favorable overseas sentiment.


Through enhanced professional army schooling, the U.S. can empower future African army leaders. Very similar to China’s School of Protection Research, this U.S. program must additionally ship an official social gathering line and by no means deviate from that line, but that line have to be democratic, open-minded, and inclusive.

To counter China in Africa the world needs resilient and empowered African states, not spheres of affect. Resilience is achieved when the African individuals consider in their governments, and in turn their governments are truthful, accountable, and effective. So when a world scholar asks at an American Warfare School, “If not China, who?” the answer should all the time be, “you.”

Lieutenant Commander Matthew Quintero, USN, is a Naval Flight Officer, E-2D Mission Commander, and recent graduate of the U.S. Naval Warfare School. His views are his own.


Adams, Gordon, and Shoon Murray, editors. Mission Creep. Georgetown College Press, 2014.

“Africa at a Tipping Point – 2017 Forum Report.” Mo Ibrahim Basis. Accessed July 15, 2019.

“China in Africa.” Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed July 15, 2019.

“College of Defence Studies – Home.” National Defence University PLA China. Accessed July 15, 2019.

“Defense Language Institute English Language Center – Course Catalog.” – House. Accessed July 15, 2019.

Hanauer, Larry, Christopher J. Springer, Chaoling Feng, Michael Joseph McNerney, Stuart E. Johnson, Stéphanie Pézard, and Shira Efron. Evaluating the Influence of the Division of Protection Regional Centers for Security Research. Santa Monica: RAND Company, 2014.

McNerney, Michael J., Stuart E. Johnson, Stéphanie Pézard, David Stebbins, Renanah Miles, Angela O’Mahony, Chaoling Feng, and Tim Oliver. Defense Establishment Building in Africa: An Evaluation. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2016.

Piombo, Jessica, editor. The US Military in Africa: Enhancing Safety and Improvement?. Boulder: First Forum Press, 2015.

Van Oudenaren, John S., and Benjamin E. Fisher. “Foreign Military Education as PLA Soft Power.” Parameters 46, no. four (Winter 2017), 105-118.

“Whole of Government Security Cooperation Planning.” Protection Institute of Security Cooperation Studies. Accessed October 10, 2018.

Featured Picture: A Chinese language paratrooper coaches his South African friends to make use of Chinese language rifles throughout a current tactical coaching train at a army training base in central China’s Hubei Province. (Photograph courtesy